Trump Administration Tries Mob-Like Tactics To Try Stopping Shipping Efficiency Standards, Of All Things.

Trump administration officials used what were basically
mob-like tactics to scuttle a propose international
green/climate change fighting shipping accord. 

A November 3 Politico article illustrates just how scary efforts to combat climate change are to the Team Trump. 

They're resorting to methods that you'd almost see in a bad mobster movie. 

First, the background: 

As I posted at the end of August, the International Maritime Organization is negotiating a "net-zero framework" for shipping, aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions form the international shipping center. 

The IMO, which has 176 member countries, regulates the safety and security if international shipping and works to prevent pollution on the oceans and seas.  

The  U.S.under Trump wants no part of clean shipping deal, because Trump thinks climate change is a "hoax" and emissions regulations are just aimed at wrecking the U.S. economy. 

Trump world thinks that, but pretty much nobody else. Whatevs. 

Back in August, we learned that Trump was strong arming countries who supported the proposed agreement. At the time, he was using his usual tariff threats. 

Now, according to Politico, it's gotten way worse. 

"Eight envoys, officials and civil society observers from Europe, granted anonymity to describe the fractious closed-door discussions and protect their relationships with those involved confirmed national delegates had reported they had been threatened with personal consequences if they went against Washington."

'Our negotiators had never see this before in any international talks,' said one European official, who had spoken to negotiators. 'People being summoned to the U.S. Embassy in London - intimidation, threats of cessation of business, threats of family members losing visas."

I'm sure any international negotiations over commerce -  or anything else for that matter  - often get tense, and we never hear about it. 

But this had to be especially bad if negotiators are willing to talk to the media, even if they do it anonymously. 

Given these are Trump people, the U.S. delegation didn't abandon tariff threats, no siree They threatened Caribbean nations with tariffs mules they agreed to postpone the shipping emissions decision, Politico reported.  

U.S. officials basically admitted this weird, excessive pressure in an October 10 press release from the State Department.

The threats in the press release against nations that sign on to the green shipping agreement include barring ships from those nations from U.S. ports; imposing visa restrictions and increasing fees on maritime crew member visas; imposing additional port fees on ships owned, operated and flagged by countries supporting the agreement; and imposing sanctions on officials supporting these climate policies.

That last one gets me. Sanctions on individuals are usually used on war criminals, or at least adjacent to war criminals. You know, like Russian oligarchs promoting the war against Ukraine, that type of thing. 

The State Department press release also labeled the planned accord as an "unsanctioned global tax regime."

What it really would have been is the first global carbon-pricing system. It would have charted ships $380 per metric ton of every extra to of CO2 equivalent they emit. Vessels would have been rewarded for reducing their emissions. 

Notice I'm referring to this thing in the past tense. 

That's because ultimately, the Trump administration's mob tactics worked, at least for now

As Politco reports:

"In a close vote, the summit chose to delay the emissions tax for a year - a feat viewed by many as a near-death blow to the measure and a major victory for Trump. Dozens of countries from Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia agreed to the delay." 

Short term, these strong-arm tactics from the Trump team worked. In the long run, they rarely do. Nations just find a way to work around the United States. That cuts us out of future negotiating and economic power. 

Eventually, individuals, governments, you name it come to understand that Trump's aggressiveness is not strength, but weakness. 

If Trump thinks he's turning us into more of a superpower than ever, he's mistaken. Instead, he's turning the U.S. into a backwater.