Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Trump To Relax Fuel Standards For Cars, Though There's Lots Of Questions About How Much That Would Help Consumers

The Trump administration is rolling back fuel efficiency
standards for cars and trucks. The Trumpsters say
that will save consumers money, but fuel costs will
eat up any savings. The climate will suffer, but
the oil and gas industry will benefit. 
The Trump announced Monday it was rolling back on the nation's fuel economy standards, claiming that will help Americans with affordability when buying cars.Though some experts suggest consumers wouldn't exactly save tons of cash. 

Washington Post describes Trump's move, announced on Monday:

"The rules still require fuel efficiency improvements but at a slower pace. Automakers now will need a car-and-truck fleet wide average of 34.9 mpg by the 2031 model year, instead of the stricter, projected 49.3  mpg under the Biden-era rule. Average fuel economy was 27.2 mpg in the 2024 model year, according to a government analysis."

In a social media post, Trump wrote his rolled back standard, "means LOWER PRICES, saving families thousands on a  new, beautiful and safe car."

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated the new vehicle price would be reduced by $1,289 due to the lower fuel standard. Whether automakers pass the savings on consumers is a very open question. 

New cars these days cost about $50,000 on average, so $1,300 is comparatively small potatoes. 

Plus, especially if gas prices remain high, that $1,300 in savings would soon evaporate. Consumers might still turn to EVs as an alternative. Especially since high gas prices will quickly erase those supposed $1,300 in savings. 

As the Washington Sun reported, the decision to loosen efficiency standards for new cars could add roughly $1,600 in fuel costs for drivers. So much for those savings on new car purchases. 

Turns out a lot of people are seeing this cost issue. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-RI posted on Bluesky: "Another fossil fuel con job. Any savings on the front end get eaten up and spat out by excess costs of fuel, which go to - oh, right - Trump's big corrupt fossil fuel donors. Fuel economy standards have saved drivers hundreds of billons of dollars."

It's all about more cash for billionaires, right?

The main point of better fuel efficiency is to reduce pollution, including the emissions that worsen climate change. 

At least we can say Trump is consistent here, which is rare for him. He hates fuel efficiency, mostly because he's in that small and shrinking group who thinks climate change is a "hoax."  Trump has already cut the federal tax credit for electric vehicle buyers, delayed federal dollars for a nationwide EV charging program, and striking down federal waivers that let California set its own strict pollution regulations, as NPR notes. 

In the long run, Trump's move to weaken fuel efficiency goals in cars might actually hinder the American automotive industry. 

As NPR reports: 

"Easing CAFE standards will hinder the industry's realignment toward more fuel-efficient and electric vehicles, said economist Sue Helper, who studies the auto industry at Case Western Reserve University. 

'It's very bad in the long term, because it slows progress,' she said. 'Then we make our auto companies less competitive. We give them less practice in making the cars that both Americans will want in the future and the rest of the world will want.'"

Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg agreed with Helper. He posted on social media: "Lowering standards will accelerate what her has already been doing: Handing the clean tech future to China and forcing Americans to pay more at the pump."

Trump's Department of Transportation is still aggressively selling the efficiency rollback. As Car and Driver reports, the department claims the alleged savings will save Americans $138 billion over the next five years.  The department also claims it will lead shoppers to buy newer vehicles, saving 1,900 lives and preventing more than 300,000 serious injuries. 

Although, we don't know whether people would actually buy new cars. The economy is bad enough such that people are holding off on purchasing new vehicles.  

I'm sure some people will buy Trump's sales pitch. There's always some gullible people out there. But the relaxed fuel efficiency standards are just a money grab for the oligarchy, and not us. 

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

National Weather Service Goes Along With "Lake America" An Expensive Way To Confuse The Public

It's still Lake Ontario in my book. But Trump, and now
the National Weather Service, among others, are 
calling it "Lake American" to satisfy, Trump's 
temper tantrum over Canada. 
The National Weather Service is go along with Donald Trump's tantrum and will now call Lake Ontario, "Lake America."  

This is in response to our Crybaby In Chief renaming Lake Ontario and calling it Lake America.  That's because Canada decided not to let Trump dictate its trade policy with other nations. 

Kind of a "We'll show 'em. We'll rename the lake."

In a public information statement issued Monday, the NWS said, "Work is underway to update naming conventions as quickly as possible on online maps, weather products, websites and other materials across the NWS."

The National Weather Service, obviously, is part of the federal government. It's overseen by the Commerce Department, which is headed by Howard Lutnick, who is a classing Trump brownoser. 

So the NWS really had no choice with this. 

As Matthew Cappucci notes on X, that the National Weather Service now needs to adjust its software and map interfaces, for about 860 days anyway. Until the next president, hopefully much more sensible than Trump, will change the lake's name to its original Lake Ontario. 

Same is true about the Gulf of Mexico.  In January, 2025, Trump renamed it "Gulf of America." The National Weather Service had to go along with that one, too. 

The private forecasting company AccuWeather said it would also call it Lake America. "As we have always done, we are adhering to the standards set by the U.S.Board on Geographic Names, which recently updated its standards with regards to Lake America."

As they ignore the politicization of place names under Trump.  

Meanwhile, many new agencies, some mapping companies and virtually all the rest of the world still refer to the bodies of water as Gulf of Mexico and Lake Ontario.  

For the record, I continue to call that body of water between Florida and Texas the Gulf of Mexico. And that big body of water west of Watertown, New York will continue to be Lake Ontario in my mind and in this here blog thingy. 

As the BBC reports:

"The organization and financial burden of the name change will likely all on the United States and its taxpayers. 'This adds another unnecessary one to US expenses which in total can exceed hundreds of millions of dollars annually,' said Usha Haley, Barton Distinguished Chair of International Business at Wichita State University. 'People have to divert time, another important resource, to manage these changes for different audiences.'

In other words, the most expensive temper tantrum ever. 

The renaming of Lake Ontario will cause confusion among the public, especially late this autumn and winter when Lake Ontario generates those big snow squalls. Can you picture it? "Heavy lake effect snow bands are coming off Lake America?" Where the hell is Lake America?

It's even more confusing because the lake is that the U.S/Canadian border goes roughly through the middle of it. Canada, of course, will continue to call it Lake Ontario. 

After all, there's no requirement that everybody goes along with Trump.  Google and Apple caved to Trump and will refer to Lake Ontario to Lake America.

MapQuest has opted to continue calling it Lake Ontario. This company was considered a bit of a has been among the mapping companies, but this situation has given them a second life. The company saw a big surge in downloads after it announced it was sticking with Lake Ontario.

Note that, companies that want to kow-tow to Trump. 

 The Associated Press will continue to call it Lake Ontario. 

"As a global news agency that disseminates news around the world, the AP must ensure that place names and geography are recognizable to broad audiences," the news organization said in a statement, 

 In general and historically, news organization copy the style of the AP. 

The AP continued to call Gulf of Mexico just that after Trump decided to rename it Gulf of America. Trump responded by blocking the AP from attending White House news conferences and other events.

This has turned into a First Amendment battle that is still going on in the courts

 For what it's worth, Oswego County, New York has opted to continue to call in Lake Ontario, apparently because the county government is actually run by adults. 

County officials said the name has historical and cultural significance, and they don't feel like saddling taxpayers and businesses with the cost of the rebranding. By the way, Oswego County is run by Republicans and the county is bastion of support for Trump in what is mostly a blue state. 

While Oswego County, New York resident won't have to bear the cost of the name change in county taxes, we, and the rest of us will. 

As the BBC reports:

"The organization and financial burden of the name change will likely all on the United States and its taxpayers. 'This adds another unnecessary one to US expenses which in total can exceed hundreds of millions of dollars annually,' said Usha Haley, Barton Distinguished Chair of International Business at Wichita State University. 'People have to divert time, another important resource, to manage these changes for different audiences.'

In other words, the most expensive temper tantrum ever. 





 


 


 

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney responded on X, saying that Canadians would continue to call the lake Lake Ontario, a name that dates back over 400 years.

 
So incredibly stupid.
Quote
Michael Lowry
@MichaelRLowry
The @NWS is proceeding with renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America in all forecast products and maps. These sort of changes require extensive coding time for @NOAA and @NWS personnel to implement across so many different products that regularly reference them. x.com/RyanNBC6/statu…

It may not seem like a big deal, but these are tax dollars needlessly spent on antagonizing our neighbor, ally, and friend Canada for petty reasons. It also puts meteorologists, who strive to be unbiased, apolitical sources of truth, in a bind regardless of how they name it.