Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts

Sunday, September 21, 2025

Trump Administration Stomps On Free Speech, Anything Could Be Targeted. Even This Little Blog

The whole Jimmy Kimmel brouhaha this week really 
crystalizes whether the First Amendment can
 survive Donald Trump. That matters to whether
this blog can continue, and much more 
importantly, whether you and everyone else
in American can continue to think 
and speak freely. 
 UPDATE 9/23/25: As you might have seen on the news, ABC has decided to return Jimmy Kimmel's show to the air, starting tonight, September 23.

However, ABC stations owned by Sinclair and Nexstar will not air the show. 

Likely because they have upcoming business moves coming up that need FCC approval and they don't want to get in trouble. 

So government censorship is still ongoing here 

That ABC reversed course does show that public pressure does work. It also shows that standing up to bullies is effective. 

PREVIOUS DISCUSSION

I'll start with a disclaimer: 

This post won't seem entirely related to weather and climate like usual, but it's an important topic. The future of real information and freedom and free speech is very much at stake. As is the risk of authoritarianism. 

As I'm sure you've heard you might have heard, Jimmy Kimmel's late night show was "pre-empted indefinitely" Wednesday. All for supposedly insensitive remarks regarding this month's murder of Charlie Kirk.

We're hearing a lot about Jimmy Kimmel and he's going to come up a lot in this post. But this isn't really about Jimmy Kimmel. It's about us. Essentially under Donald Trump's regime, we are all potential Jimmy Kimmels. Or worse. 

The whole thing this week is part of a fast-rising push by Donald Trump and his minions to block  anything but adoring praise for our Orange god. 

It's fascist and stomps all over the First Amendment, but here we are.  

Trump's idea of "free speech" is only speech that he likes. He claimed the other day that 97 percent of the news stories about him are negative. "I think that's really illegal, personally."

Even if his 97 percent figure was true, which it isn't, there would be nothing "illegal" about it. And he prefaced that statement with "I'm a very strong person for free speech."

Sure, Jan. 

No wonder the late night talk show hosts have been mocking him.  

Naturally, Trump is apparently going after late night comedians and daytime talk show hosts first.  Unlike his predecessors in the Oval Office, he is too much of our Snowflake In Chief  to withstand the usual late night comics digs and zings against presidents. 

Trump's administration pushed CBS to announce plans to end Stephen Colbert's show. He has repeatedly said he intends to end the late night comedy/talk shows hosted by Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers. 

That he's going after comedians first is telling. 

"Comedy does not change the world, but it's a bellwether. We're the banana peel in the coal mine. When a society is under threat, comedians are the ones who get sent away first," Jon Stewart said during his 2022 Mark Twain Award acceptance speech. 

Stewart was prescient, wasn't he?.

This blog is not a big target. Yet. Mostly because I'm really not much of a comedian. And I'm really small potatoes. But you have to wonder, as Stewart said, that if comedians are the first target the rest of us are next.   

We've already seen a bunch of people get fired after Trump's MAGA gang of internet trolls went after people who inadequately grieved over Charlie Kirk. 

I have been critical of the Trump administration's policies or lack thereof on NOAA, the National Weather Service, climate change and other related topics. 

I criticized the DOGE firing of hundreds of National Weather Service employees. I condemned cutbacks on meteorological and climate research. I've mocked Trump on his stance that climate change is a "hoax".  I'm working on a piece now about how some of  his Congressional minions held a conspiracy theory-filled House hearing on weather modification batshittery. 

So, I figure eventually the Trump people, or at least his ragtag social media censorship army will come along to stop all this. But I'll keep going, as everybody who knows me understands it's really hard to shut me up. 

It's not about me, though. It's about you. Unless somebody stops this, we are headed to a point where anything you say might get you in trouble. Even if you like Trump but say something "wrong." 

HOW KIMMEL HAPPENED

There are a lot of offensive things going on here, but Kimmel is not the problem. 

Let's pick it apart, like everyone else seems to be doing. 

Given the atmosphere, I must offer my Captain Obvious opinion on Kirk's death. The murder was horrible, abhorrent and was incredibly wrong no matter how you slice it.   Kirk absolutely did not deserve it. I hope the person who pulled the trigger is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. 

I'm not saying this to be nice, or to be "correct." Or to please Trump and his merry band of MAGA warriors. It's how I feel and it's how everyone I talked to about it feels.

Anyway,  Trump demanded, and ABC/Disney wimpishly agreeing to suspend Jimmy Kimmel from his late night show for saying something accurate, speaking truth to power, but in the process displeasing our snowflake King "president" Trump.

Here's Kimmel's supposedly objectionable statement: "We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."

Notice that sentence, inelegant as it is,  doesn't characterize Kirk one way or another. It also doesn't precisely speculate on the motives behind the assassination. 

Kimmel went on to mock Trump for answering a question about Kirk's death by bragging about White House ballroom construction. 

Trump supporters would have you believe that it was just a private decision by Disney-owned ABC  and Nexstar, the largest owner of television stations in the U.S.,to yank Kimmel off the air. An outfit called Sinclair also owns a lot of ABC affiliates, and wanted Kimmel pulled, too.

Well, if someone says something to make a corporation makes "look bad," they can fire him, right?

Sure, it happens all the time. But what's really going on is an ugly Intersection of fascism and money.

Nexstar needs FCC approval for a deal to acquire an outfit called Tegan. The mega-merger would reach 80 percent of U.S households. But the FCC would have to bend the rules, since a longstanding rule prevents any one company from reaching 39 percent of U.S. households.

Enter Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr. He said, "We can do this the easy way or the hard way......These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action on Kimmel, or there's going to be additional work for the FCC ahead." 

Basically, he said,  "Nice network and TV stations you got there. It would be a shame if anything happened to them." Even right wing Republican Ted Cruz correctly criticized Carr's remarks as "right out of Goodfellas."

THE EFFECTS

You see how cute Carr and the rest of the Trumpsters are being with this. They can just say it was ABC and the television stations' decision. Never mind that they did so with a threat of a government crackdown. 

That's where the First Amendment comes in. If I'm your boss and you say something objectionable, in most cases I can fire you. But the First Amendment prohibits the government from suppressing free speech. Even if it's objectionable speech. . 

Apparently, the Trumpsters don't believe in the Constitution. 

Even if courts or somebody resists this trampling of First Amendment rights, free speech has been chilled, which is exactly what Trump wants. 

You can see it on other shows. The women on the ABC show "The View" always weigh in on the top news headlines of the day. They were silent on Kimmel's situation. Because Trump has already criticized that show so they figure they're on the cusp of being canceled.

Carr has already put "The View" in his cross hairs.   

Trump has also said other talk show hosts like Seth Meyers and Jimmy Fallon should be off the air, too, since they mock the Fearless Leader. Jon Stewart and his friends at "The Daily Show" are somewhat more out of reach of the Trump for now because they are Comedy Central, which isn't licensed by the FCC.

However,  Comedy Central is owned by Paramount Skydance Corp, which has also bended the knee to Trump's demands before. 

PATRIOTISM

To their credit, late night hosts are so far now cowed by Trump. On the day after Kimmel's firing, or suspension or whatever you want to call it, the comedians rallied around Kimmel, and more importantly, the First Amendment. 

Stewart's opening monologue was a mocking version of groveling acquiescence to Trump.  Stephen Colbert began his monologue saying "With an autocrat, you cannot give an inch. And if ABC thinks this is going to satisfy the regime, they are woefully naive."

To be blunt, ABC was incredibly unpatriotic in suspending Kimmel. The put money before country, and look where that got them.

People are dropping their ABC/Disney/ESPN subscriptions in droves. They're canceling Disney vacations and Disney cruises. It's too soon to say how big a financial hit ABC will take, and whether the hit will last long. 

 Trump and his team are actually besmirching Kirk's legacy.  I had a LOT of problems with what much of Kirk said while he was alive. But he really was a free speech advocate. Kirk said the Constitution protected even what he would regard as ugly, gross or evil speech.

 I wonder if Kirk would agree with what's going on if he were still alive. 

There are of course consequences for free speech. And if those consequences don't come from the government, that's mostly OK. Not always fair, not always targeted correctly, but at least the free market that Republicans used to embrace did its job. 

The trouble with all this is it leads to just one voice in the media - from the Trump regime. The ultimate goal might be to have no independent journalism. Whatever the government says would be the "truth."  

That never ends well. Look it up in your history books.  

Readers who are fans of Trump should also understand that his regime can turn on you if you say or do one wrong thing. MAGA always says they stand for freedom. If you really love freedom, this is your moment to speak up. 

 I don't whether somebody from the regime will try to shut me and everybody else down or not, because they don't like what we say and do. 

But remember, there's millions of us and only a relative few of them. We can still win this. Peacefully, with creativity, and resolve, and humor and persistence. 

It's time to be loud, folks!

Friday, February 21, 2025

Don't Say "Climate": Trump Administration Scrubbing Climate Information From Federal Websites,

Don't say climate change!  Trump administration scrubs
mention of it from everywhere, because if you don't 
see the words then it doesn't exist, apparently. 
 If you don't say "climate change" then it doesn't exist.  

That, apparently is the logic of our lovely Trump administration as federal websites across the board remove pretty much all references to climate change over the course of his first month in office. 

Trump's first term played fast and loose with lots of information including items related to climate change. 

But this time, it's a full throttled Orwellian vision in which "facts" are whatever the Trump administration wants them to be. Reality is besides the point.  

This post isn't even talking yet about anticipated firings at NOAA and NWS that will hobble the nation's weather forecasting and warning system. That' update is coming in a future post arriving pretty soon. I'm just talking in this post about the Trump administration's thought that if you don't ever think about climate change, then it will never be a problem. 

Or something like that. 

Among the harmful firings at the Federal Emergency Management Agency or FEMA are staffers that worked on climate change related issues. Since climate change affects the severity, location and types of disasters the U.S. faces, you'd think you'd need these staffers,

You know, to anticipate where and how disasters might strike so the agency can more readily help victims of these calamities. 

But I guess not 

The sprawling federal Agriculture Department has been ordered to scrub references to climate change as well, as Politico reports. 

The directive "could affect information across dozens of programs including climate-smart agriculture initiatives, USDA climate has, and Forest Service information regarding wildfires the frequency and severity of which scientists have linked to hotter, drier conditions fueled by climate change."

For now, some climate related material is still available from the Agriculture Department. USDA Climate Hubs, for example, was still up as of Wednesday (FEB5

NASA's Global Climate Change website is about to transition away, it it hasn't already.    It's been a handy source of climate information, including a dashboard on the home page that gives you the current amount of carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere and their trends, global temperature and its trend and what direction Arctic sea ice is headed. Spoiler: Down.

There's now suddenly a disclaimer on the NASA Global Climate Change website that says "NASA's Global Climate Change website is going to look a little different in the coming months because we're headed to a new home, a more integrated portal on science.nasa.gov. Keep your eyes on our new space as we transition."

Yeah, love the attempt at the PR language (eye roll).  I'm not going to make a definitive conclusion on what the Trump administration is going to do with this site, but I bet it's not good. 

Climate information is disappearing from a lot of federal government websites, not just NASA. As Inside Climate News reports:

"The Trump administration is also removing climate information and documents from the U.S. State Department website, which (several days ago) had a climate section filled with documents related to U.S. climate policies aimed at meting the terms of the 2014 Paris climate pact, as well as materials outlining reaching plans to cut emissions of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide, including methane.

But searching the current State Department website for the term 'global warming' just now leads to a long list of non-functioning links, with the Biden-era climate materials relegated to archives that have to be searched for separately."

 Even experienced scientists are now beginning to have trouble finding climate info on government websites. As Inside Climate News reports:

"Some of the changes may already be making it harder for U.S. climate scientists to collaborate internationally. 

David Ho, a University of Hawaii at Manoa climate researcher, said last week he found an error message when he tried to look for reports related to his work on ocean carbon cycles on the White House Office of Science and Technology website."

There are efforts to preserve web material that already exists before it is completely scrubbed. There's End of Term Web Archive, which is a collaboration of nonprofit groups, universities and two federal agencies to preserve scientific data. 

Other organizations have been combing government websites, preserving science data before it can be scrubbed by the Trump administration. 

I worry it's a matter of time that we won't be able to see basic climate data like the monthly reports NOAA"s National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) regularly releases.

Or even just the huge waves of routine daily data all the National Weather Service offices release. After all, some rogue scientist could use and compile that data to find temperature trends (which is part of what the NCEI does now.

Guy Walton, the dude from Guy on Climate agrees, as this lack of information hurts everyone, from citizen scientists like me to experts like Walton. 

"....if the NCEI surface temperature records site gets taken down, I can't do my research. Only a few months ago, ,I was thinking that after the election of Kamala Harris, the NCEI record site might be improved with some of my input. Now I will feel fortunate if it and other tools for research used by many other scientists are not touched. We will see." 

Any truthful information is suspect in the Trump administration. You probably don't even have to use "banned"words or phrases like climate change or global warming. 

Merely mentioning a record hot day, month or season might well get you in trouble 

Even collaboration of any kind is out. As CBC reported, any cooperation between Canadian scientists or Environment Canada and NOAA are pretty much verboten. 

NOAA scientists now just submit for review if any discussions with Canadians include climate, energy, offshore wind, ocean mapping and exploration, competitive seafood, aquaculture, ocean plastics, the World Meteorological Organization, Arctic security and Arctic energy, notes CBC. 

A side effect of all this would be a brain drain from the United States to Canada and European countries, perhaps Asia too.

Most scientists want to seek the truth of the world around them. If that becomes impossible to do in the United States, then do it elsewhere, right?

The Trump administration's scrubbing away of any references to climate change won't just hurt Americans subject to the direct disasters and dangers created by global warming. Our economy, our innovation, our safety, our own wallets are all at risk. 

All because the merry band of oligarchs want to make a few more trillion dollars.